An insurance policy should not contain provisions that allow one side
or the other to unilaterally void the contract in exchange for benefit.
Provisions that void the contract for failure to perform or for fraud
or material misrepresentation are ordinary and acceptable.
The policy should have a term of not more than about three years.
This is not a hard and fast rule. Contracts of over five years duration
are classified as ‘long-term,’ which can impact the accounting
treatment, and can obviously introduce the possibility that over the
entire term of the contract, no actual risk will transfer. The coverage
provided by the contract need not cease at the end of the term (e.g.,
the contract can cover occurrences as opposed to claims made or claims
paid).
The contract should be considered to include any other agreements,
written or oral, that confer rights, create obligations, or create
benefits on the part of either or both parties. Ideally, the contract
should contain an ‘Entire Agreement’ clause that assures there are no
undisclosed written or oral side agreements that confer rights, create
obligations, or create benefits on the part of either or both parties.
If such rights, obligations or benefits exist, they must be factored
into the tests of reasonableness and significance.
The contract should not contain arbitrary limitations on timing of
payments. Provisions that assure both parties of time to properly
present and consider claims are acceptable provided they are
commercially reasonable and customary.
Provisions that expressly create actual or notional accounts that
accrue actual or notional interest suggest that the contract contains,
in fact, a deposit.
Provisions for additional or return premium do not, in and of
themselves, render a contract something other than insurance. However,
it should be unlikely that either a return or additional premium
provision be triggered, and neither party should have discretion
regarding the timing of such triggering.
All of the events that would give rise to claims under the contract
cannot have materialized prior to the inception of the contract. If this
"all events" test is not met, then the contract is considered to be a
retroactive contract, for which the accounting treatment becomes
complex.